THINKING, FAST AND SLOW DANIEL KAHNEMAN
Worksheet · English
Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman · Psychology & Decision-Making
Use this worksheet to engage actively with the 7 core ideas. Write your own thoughts, complete the practice tasks, and answer the reflection questions. There are no right answers – only your answers.
Name
Date
Re-read on
01
System 1 & System 2
Two systems. One mind. Constant conflict.
Your brain runs two parallel systems: one fast and automatic, one slow and deliberate. Most of your decisions are made by the wrong one.
In practice
For the next week, before making any significant decision, pause and ask: which system is driving this? If it feels obvious and easy, System 1 is probably in charge. The feeling of certainty is not evidence of correctness – it's often evidence that you're not thinking hard enough.
I tried this this week
Reflect
Think of a recent decision that felt obvious and certain. Was System 1 driving it – or System 2?
02
Cognitive Biases
You are not as rational as you think.
Cognitive biases are not quirks or exceptions. They are the default operating mode of the human brain.
In practice
Before your next important decision, write down the three most likely cognitive biases that could be distorting your thinking. Anchoring: have you been influenced by the first number or idea you heard? Confirmation: are you mainly looking for evidence that supports what you already think? Availabili...
I tried this this week
Reflect
Which cognitive bias do you think affects your decisions most? Anchoring, availability, or confirmation bias?
03
Prospect Theory
Losses hurt twice as much as gains feel good.
We are not rational about gains and losses. Losing €100 feels roughly twice as bad as gaining €100 feels good. This asymmetry drives most bad financial decisions.
In practice
Review a recent decision you avoided making. Was the avoidance rational, or was it driven by loss aversion? Specifically: did you avoid a decision because the potential loss felt unbearable, even though the expected value was positive? Loss aversion often masquerades as prudence.
I tried this this week
Reflect
Think of a risk you've been avoiding. Is the avoidance rational – or driven by loss aversion?
04
Overconfidence
You know less than you think. Everyone does.
Overconfidence is the most pervasive and damaging cognitive bias. Experts are not immune – often they are more overconfident, not less.
In practice
For your next prediction or estimate, give a confidence interval rather than a single number. Instead of 'this will take 3 weeks', say 'I think this will take between 2 and 6 weeks, with 3 weeks being my best guess.' Then track your actual accuracy over time. Most people discover their confidence in...
I tried this this week
Reflect
Think of your last confident prediction. How accurate was it? Did you track it?
05
The Narrative Fallacy
The story is not the truth. It's a shortcut.
Humans are story-making machines. We create coherent narratives from random events and then mistake the story for reality.
In practice
Think of a significant success or failure in your life. Write down the story you tell about why it happened. Then ask: how much of this was genuinely caused by the factors I'm identifying? What role did luck, timing, or factors outside my control play? Honest accounting of randomness is one of the m...
I tried this this week
Reflect
Think of a success or failure you've explained with a neat story. How much was actually luck?
06
Two Selves
The experiencing self and the remembering self disagree.
The self that lives your life and the self that remembers it are not the same. We optimise for memory at the expense of experience.
In practice
Plan your next significant experience – a holiday, a project, a difficult conversation – with both selves in mind. What would make the experience better while it's happening? What ending would make it remembered most positively? These are often different design problems.
I tried this this week
Reflect
When did you last plan something that took twice as long as expected? Did you update your future estimates?
07
Better Decisions
Slow down. Use checklists. Question the obvious.
You cannot eliminate cognitive biases. But you can build systems that catch them before they cause damage.
In practice
Before your next major decision, run a pre-mortem: assume it has gone badly, and write down the three most likely reasons why. This is not pessimism – it is System 2 doing the work that System 1 wants to skip. The goal is not to talk yourself out of the decision, but to stress-test it honestly.
I tried this this week
Reflect
What decision are you facing now where a pre-mortem would be most useful?
Core message
We are not thinking machines that feel.
We are feeling machines that think.
Before you decide
"When did you last make a confident decision that turned out to be wrong – and what did you learn from it?"